New Berkeley Earth High Resolution Dataset


Berkeley Earth just released a new version of the GMST dataset, and it has 4 times the spatial resolution of the previous version of the data set at 0.25° x 0.25° (that's about 30 km at the equator). Visually, the difference is pretty striking when viewing temperature anomalies as a map. Here, for instance are 2022 global temperatures relative to a 1981-2010 mean.


The time series has also slightly different from the previous version. Comparing the new high resolution dataset to the previous version, global temperatures in the base period appear to be slightly higher, lowering the amount of current warming above the 1980-1900 mean slightly. However, current warming rates appear to be slightly higher, at about 0.22°C/decade instead of 0.21°C/decade for the last 30 years. Here's how 30-year trends have changed across the dataset.


To illustrate this, in a recent post, I calculated the warming above the 1850-1900 mean in the three datasets that go back to 1850, and the current anomaly for BEST in 2022 was 1.30°C. I redid the same thing with the updated, high resolution dataset and came up with a current anomaly of 1.28°C.
Here's my updated table of projections based on continuing linear trends for when we pass the major IPCC targets. The trends and anomaly in the high resolution dataset continue to expect that we will cross these targets more quickly than in the other two (that's 2032 for +1.5°C and 2054 for +2.0°C), and the average of all three is 2035 for +1.5°C and 2058 for +2.0°C. Projections from HadCRUT5 are basically indistinguishable from the average of the three, so likely I'll continue to use HadCRUT5 most often, but I love the high resolution maps in BEST.


According to their website, the high resolution of the data is made possible by machine learning, and it works analogously to technologies that add resolution to blurry images. In essence, the new dataset employs weather patterns from high resolution weather data and uses this information to improve the spatial resolution of their temperature maps, which makes it possible to more accurately resolve smaller scale climate changes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Marketing of Alt-Data at Temperature.Global

Image
Temperature.Global (12-month running average, sort of) A few years ago, I started seeing people post links to a new dataset for global temperatures at a website called temperature.global. There are at least four unique features of this dataset. First, the website claims to update global temperature in near real time. Second, every year in the dataset averages below "normal." Third, there is absolutely no transparency regarding their methodology (those who administer it are anonymous, most of the data is hidden, and much of their methodology is unclear). And fourth, what is disclosed about their methodology reveals that what they are calculating is not the Earth's surface temperature. Description of Temperature.Global If you go to the temperature.global website, it becomes almost immediately apparent that this website has little concern for transparency. The website is hosted by Parler (the alternative social network), which if nothing else is pretty odd. There are no name...
Read more

Roy Spencer on Models and Observations

Image
A few days ago, Dr. Roy Spencer wrote a piece for the Heritage Foundation called, " Global Warming: Observations vs. Climate Models " ( PDF ) essentially arguing that models show too much warming compared to observations, and if we stick to observations, "global warming offers no justification for carbon-based regulation." He claims to frame his argument in terms of answering three questions: Is recent warming of the climate system materially attributable to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, as is usually claimed? Is the rate of observed warming close to what computer climate models—used to guide public policy—show? Has the observed rate of warming been sufficient to justify alarm and extensive regulation of CO2 emissions? We should keep in mind that this is a political document intended to support the political aims of the Heritage Foundation, and Spencer has carefully selected what he says and doesn't say to fit the political agenda of the Heritage Found...
Read more

Patrick Frank Publishes on Errors Again

Image
Recently I came across yet another paper by Patrick Frank[1] attempting to claim that climate scientists have been underestimating uncertainties in climate-related data. In this paper, he takes aim at GMST data, and he argues that  LiG resolution limits, non-linearity, and sensor field calibrations yield GSATA mean ±2σ RMS uncertainties of, 1900–1945, ±1.7 °C; 1946–1980, ±2.1 °C; 1981–2004, ±2.0 °C; and 2005–2010, ±1.6 °C. Finally, the 20th century (1900–1999) GSATA, 0.74 ± 1.94 °C, does not convey any information about rate or magnitude of temperature change. The resulting GMST graph from his calculations is below. Essentially, he's saying that errors associated with liquid in glass thermometers are so large that we can have no confidence in the global warming trend in the major GMST datasets. Of course, the organizations producing these GMST datasets all evaluate the uncertainties associated with their anomaly values, and their estimates are invariably much smaller - about ±0.05°...
Read more