Quaternary Climate

The Quaternary Period refers to the last 2.6 million years of the Earth's history. While glaciation in Antarctica occurred earlier in the Cenozoic, the Quaternary Period refers to glacial cycles synced to Milankovitch Cycles, or orbital cycles, which affect that distribution of energy that the Earth receives either throughout the year or between the poles. The Quaternary is made up of two Epochs, the Pleistocene and the Holocene. The Holocene refers to the most recent interglacial (the last 11,700 years). All of the glacial cycles prior to the Holocene make up the Pleistocene.

Pleistocene

  1. The glacial cycles of the Pleistocene have been synced to orbital cycles, but a transition occurred about 1 million years ago, which is called the Mid-Pleistocene Transition. At that time, these cycles shifted from being synced obliquity to eccentricity.
  2. Early reconstructions of the glacial cycles showed that CO2 increases lagged behind increases in Antarctic temperatures. However, it turns out that increases in CO2 and temperature were nearly synchronous and global temperature increases followed increases in CO2. 
  3. CO2 levels at 420 ppm exceed any levels we've experienced in the entire Quaternary. The implications for the long-term changes in climate, especially sea level rise, are enormous.
  4. The Younger Dryas marks the transition to he Holocene, and it's an example of abrupt climate change. The probable causes are extremely interesting.

Holocene

  1. Marcott 2013 was an extremely influential reconstruction extending our understanding of global temperatures to the beginning of the Holocene. I wrote a couple posts explaining the value of the reconstruction and the evidence that it shows current warming to be truly exceptional.
  2. The GISP2 ice core reconstructs temperatures at the Greenland Summit for the last 50,000 years or so, but contrarians have misused this data in countless ways.
  3. Some graphs of the Holocene appear to be either made up entirely or modified to the point of being nearly unrecognizable.
  4. The second part of my review of Inconvenient Facts contains refutations of some of Gregory Wrightstone's counterfactual claims about the Holocene.

Common Era

  1. Some use Loehle 2007 (corrected in 2008) to suggest that the Medieval Warm Period was warmer than today, even though the time series ends in the 1930s.
  2. Some use solar reconstructions to suggest that the Medieval Warm Period was warmer than today, even though the Sun is a stable star, and solar variability is small.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Marketing of Alt-Data at Temperature.Global

Image
Temperature.Global (12-month running average, sort of) A few years ago, I started seeing people post links to a new dataset for global temperatures at a website called temperature.global. There are at least four unique features of this dataset. First, the website claims to update global temperature in near real time. Second, every year in the dataset averages below "normal." Third, there is absolutely no transparency regarding their methodology (those who administer it are anonymous, most of the data is hidden, and much of their methodology is unclear). And fourth, what is disclosed about their methodology reveals that what they are calculating is not the Earth's surface temperature. Description of Temperature.Global If you go to the temperature.global website, it becomes almost immediately apparent that this website has little concern for transparency. The website is hosted by Parler (the alternative social network), which if nothing else is pretty odd. There are no name...
Read more

Roy Spencer on Models and Observations

Image
A few days ago, Dr. Roy Spencer wrote a piece for the Heritage Foundation called, " Global Warming: Observations vs. Climate Models " ( PDF ) essentially arguing that models show too much warming compared to observations, and if we stick to observations, "global warming offers no justification for carbon-based regulation." He claims to frame his argument in terms of answering three questions: Is recent warming of the climate system materially attributable to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, as is usually claimed? Is the rate of observed warming close to what computer climate models—used to guide public policy—show? Has the observed rate of warming been sufficient to justify alarm and extensive regulation of CO2 emissions? We should keep in mind that this is a political document intended to support the political aims of the Heritage Foundation, and Spencer has carefully selected what he says and doesn't say to fit the political agenda of the Heritage Found...
Read more

Patrick Frank Publishes on Errors Again

Image
Recently I came across yet another paper by Patrick Frank[1] attempting to claim that climate scientists have been underestimating uncertainties in climate-related data. In this paper, he takes aim at GMST data, and he argues that  LiG resolution limits, non-linearity, and sensor field calibrations yield GSATA mean ±2σ RMS uncertainties of, 1900–1945, ±1.7 °C; 1946–1980, ±2.1 °C; 1981–2004, ±2.0 °C; and 2005–2010, ±1.6 °C. Finally, the 20th century (1900–1999) GSATA, 0.74 ± 1.94 °C, does not convey any information about rate or magnitude of temperature change. The resulting GMST graph from his calculations is below. Essentially, he's saying that errors associated with liquid in glass thermometers are so large that we can have no confidence in the global warming trend in the major GMST datasets. Of course, the organizations producing these GMST datasets all evaluate the uncertainties associated with their anomaly values, and their estimates are invariably much smaller - about ±0.05°...
Read more