Tony Heller on Radiosonde Data

Radiosonde Data Since 1958

Sometimes it's difficult to believe the stuff that Tony Heller says. In one of his blogposts[1] from 2016, Heller claimed that NOAA has been hiding radiosonde data in “their latest attempt to defraud the public.” According to Heller, NOAA is hiding this data because they don’t want to tell you that there has been no warming since 1958. As he writes, “Here is why they are hiding the rest of the data. The earlier data showed as much pre-1979 cooling as the post-1979 warming.” He then goes on to haphazardly splice a graph from a paper in 1978[2] with another graph showing radiosonde data from 1979 on (from NOAA’s 2015 climate report).[3]  From this he concludes that there has been no warming in radiosonde data for the last 58 years.

However, careful observers will note that Heller just slapped one graph on top of the other. He didn't even bother to find the data and graph both together properly. He literally just lined up 0 C on both graphs, but the problem is that the two graphs have two different baselines. The first one is from 1958-1977 and has no overlap with the 1981-2010 baseline in NOAA’s later graph from 1979 on. They are two different baselines, but Heller lined them up as if they were the same.

Heller Slapped Together Two Graphs with Different Baselines

But wait, there's more! It turns out that the two graphs Heller slapped together don’t even measure the same things. The 1978 graph presents an average temperature of the surface to 100 mb (that is, 0 to ~53,000 ft). The 2015 graph presents individual trends ranging from 5,000 ft to 40,000 ft. Both of these include part of the stratosphere. But since the stratosphere is cooling, this means that the 1978 graph will show a lower trend since it mixes the troposphere with more of the stratosphere. The 2019 report, however, shows radiosonde data within the troposphere since 1958.

This Radiosonde Data Was Cleverly Hidden in Plain Sight[4]

So it turns out that climate scientists have been doing a really crappy job of “hiding” this data as Heller imagines. In fact, they seem more than willing to publish it, and you can find a proper graph showing radiosonde data from 1958 to 2019 in a 2019 State of the Climate Report above.[4]. A proper graph with a proper baseline shows a warming trend in radiosonde data since 1958.It just goes to show that when a blogger says that pretty much the entirety of climate science is looking to defraud the public, it's best to check up on his claims. It's far more likely that the blogger is incompetent than it is that rest of the world is lying. So in the spirit of full disclosure, I provided links to all my sources so you can check up on what this blogger has to say.

Resources:

[1] Tony Heller. “NOAA Radiosonde Data Shows No Warming For 58 Years.” https://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years/

[2] Angell, J. K., & Korshover, J. (1978). Global Temperature Variation, Surface-100 mb: An Update into 1977, Monthly Weather Review, 106(6), 755-770. Retrieved Sep 6, 2021, from https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/106/6/1520-0493_1978_106_0755_gtvsma_2_0_co_2.xml

[3] NOAA/NASA Annual Global Analysis for 2015. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/briefings/201601.pdf

[4] Dunn, R. J. H., D. M. Stanitski, N. Gobron, and K. M. Willett, Eds., 2020: Global Climate [in “State of the Climate in 2019"].Bull. Amer. Meteor., 101 (8), S9–S127, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0104.1
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/101/8/bamsD200104.xml?tab_body=pdf






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Marketing of Alt-Data at Temperature.Global

Image
Temperature.Global (12-month running average, sort of) A few years ago, I started seeing people post links to a new dataset for global temperatures at a website called temperature.global. There are at least four unique features of this dataset. First, the website claims to update global temperature in near real time. Second, every year in the dataset averages below "normal." Third, there is absolutely no transparency regarding their methodology (those who administer it are anonymous, most of the data is hidden, and much of their methodology is unclear). And fourth, what is disclosed about their methodology reveals that what they are calculating is not the Earth's surface temperature. Description of Temperature.Global If you go to the temperature.global website, it becomes almost immediately apparent that this website has little concern for transparency. The website is hosted by Parler (the alternative social network), which if nothing else is pretty odd. There are no name
Read more

Are Scientists and Journalists Conspiring to Retract Papers?

Image
Dr. Roger Pielke, Jr has published two posts recently having to do with extreme weather and the IPCC. In the first post , he expresses frustration over an apparently inevitable retraction of a paper on extreme weather. The paper is Alimonti et al 2022 (A22) published in The European Physical Journal Plus (EPJP)[1]. I became aware of this paper about a year ago; it was not a good paper and was not particularly influential; it received almost no attention except for a brief period of time when the usual blogs promoted it, and then after SkyNews in Australia publicized this study as demonstrating there is no climate emergency. In the second post , Pielke summarized what he believes the IPCC's position is on extreme weather, and here he refers again to this previous paper. He declares that he believes that popular and scientific treatments of extreme weather have become far mor extreme than the position taken by the IPCC. According to him, "with the exception perhaps of only extr
Read more

Tropical Cyclone Trends

Image
In a previous post , I covered the distinction between detection and attribution. These are normally considered sequentially. First you detect a signal above natural variability, then you examine if some portion of that signal can be attributed to human activity. The previous post shows that the two are statistically independent from each other, so there is no need to limit attribution studies to signals that are detectable above natural variability. This distinction and clarification I think is important in discussions of tropical cyclone trends. While trends are clear since 1980, the longer term record (since ~1850-1900) is less clear due to selection biases arising from our increasing ability to detect tropical cyclones. This makes detection difficult long term, but that doesn't necessarily mean that scientists can't also examine ways in which human activity is affecting tropical cyclone trends. Detection in the Satellite Record (Since 1980) The satellite record provides us
Read more