Tony Heller's Proxy Trick

Recently I've seen people posting the following graph from Tony Heller, which is intended to show a cooling trend in temperatures following the 1940s and suggest that the "start of the satellite record" begins when temperatures are at their low point. Heller's graph is unsourced except for being called "Briffa's Reconstruction."

This graph has shown up on Twitter, and so far I haven't seen any one identify the source of this data or even what the data represents. However, I was able to determine that up through 1960, the data is identical to Briffa 2001[1], and the data is on an Excel spreadsheet on an FTP site maintained by NOAA for plate 3 of Briffa's paper. The same site also has regional data that includes years following 1960 (plate 2 in Briffa's paper), but Briffa is clear that the post-1960 data does not have a clear temperature signal. Briffa writes, "The period after 1960 was not used to avoid bias in the regression coefficients that could be generated by an anomalous decline in tree density measurements over recent decades that is not forced by temperature [Briffa et al., 1998b]." The divergence problem has been well-documented, especially in Briffa et al 1998; what Briffa is describing here in 2001 was well-understood. Furthermore, Briffa's data is neither global nor annual; it corresponds to the growth season of the Northern Hemisphere land, essentially from April through September. So beginning in 1850, an honest graph of Briffa 2001 should look like this.

The post-1960 data shouldn't be used because the tree ring density measurements in that data are not forced by temperature, so it's not a good proxy for NH growth season temperatures. Of course, this is exactly why Heller used the post-1960 data; he's not interested in showing data with a clear temperature signal. He's interested in showing what will give the impression of cooling following 1940. NOAA's website allows you to download April - September NH land temperatures. If we include both Briffa 2001 through 1960 and NOAA through 2023, this is what the temperature record looks like since 1850.
And of course the most interesting part of Briffa's paper is not the data following 1850 (we have the instrumental record for that) but the data preceding 1850. It turns out that if you plot data from Briffa 2000 and Briffa 2001 along with the instrumental record, you get a hockey stick shape that agrees pretty closely with the MBH99 hockey stick. I show all of these below.

So it would seem that Heller is up to his old tricks again. He's being extremely selective with his use of data, he's deliberately using data that lacks a clear temperature signal as if it does, and he's ignoring the temperature signal recorded by thermometer data. None of the actual data agrees with him, so he has to resort to tricks to create false impression of what's actually going on.


References:

[1] Briffa et al. (2001) J Geophys Res 106, 2929-2941. The data through 1960 is here: ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/treering/reconstructions/n_hem_temp/briffa2001jgr3.xls

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Marketing of Alt-Data at Temperature.Global

Image
Temperature.Global (12-month running average, sort of) A few years ago, I started seeing people post links to a new dataset for global temperatures at a website called temperature.global. There are at least four unique features of this dataset. First, the website claims to update global temperature in near real time. Second, every year in the dataset averages below "normal." Third, there is absolutely no transparency regarding their methodology (those who administer it are anonymous, most of the data is hidden, and much of their methodology is unclear). And fourth, what is disclosed about their methodology reveals that what they are calculating is not the Earth's surface temperature. Description of Temperature.Global If you go to the temperature.global website, it becomes almost immediately apparent that this website has little concern for transparency. The website is hosted by Parler (the alternative social network), which if nothing else is pretty odd. There are no name
Read more

Are Scientists and Journalists Conspiring to Retract Papers?

Image
Dr. Roger Pielke, Jr has published two posts recently having to do with extreme weather and the IPCC. In the first post , he expresses frustration over an apparently inevitable retraction of a paper on extreme weather. The paper is Alimonti et al 2022 (A22) published in The European Physical Journal Plus (EPJP)[1]. I became aware of this paper about a year ago; it was not a good paper and was not particularly influential; it received almost no attention except for a brief period of time when the usual blogs promoted it, and then after SkyNews in Australia publicized this study as demonstrating there is no climate emergency. In the second post , Pielke summarized what he believes the IPCC's position is on extreme weather, and here he refers again to this previous paper. He declares that he believes that popular and scientific treatments of extreme weather have become far mor extreme than the position taken by the IPCC. According to him, "with the exception perhaps of only extr
Read more

Tropical Cyclone Trends

Image
In a previous post , I covered the distinction between detection and attribution. These are normally considered sequentially. First you detect a signal above natural variability, then you examine if some portion of that signal can be attributed to human activity. The previous post shows that the two are statistically independent from each other, so there is no need to limit attribution studies to signals that are detectable above natural variability. This distinction and clarification I think is important in discussions of tropical cyclone trends. While trends are clear since 1980, the longer term record (since ~1850-1900) is less clear due to selection biases arising from our increasing ability to detect tropical cyclones. This makes detection difficult long term, but that doesn't necessarily mean that scientists can't also examine ways in which human activity is affecting tropical cyclone trends. Detection in the Satellite Record (Since 1980) The satellite record provides us
Read more