A New Reconstruction of Arctic Sea Ice Extent Since 1850

Over the last decade, there have been several attempts to reconstruct Arctic Sea Ice Extent. Kinnard et al 2011[1] reconstructed Arctic sea ice over the last 1450 years. Within that paper he also included a reconstruction beginning in 1870. Both of his reconstructions show natural variability of sea ice cover followed by a dramatic decline following ~1970. Walsh et al 2017[2] reconstructed sea ice extent beginning in 1850 with a monthly time resolution. His reconstruction also showed some natural variability followed by a dramatic decrease in sea ice extent following ~1970. But just last year, Brennan et al. 2020[3] examined Walsh’s study and found that likely underestimated sea ice variability, especially in the early 20th century, and sea ice extent is likely more sensitive to rising temperatures than is shown in Walsh’s study. Her analysis produced what is likely the best reconstruction of annual sea ice extent to date, and while it largely agrees with Walsh, it shows a greater decrease in sea ice extent in the early 20th century.

Brennan compares early 20th century warming (ETCW) from 1900-1940 to the satellite era from 1979-2018 by examining average 25-year trends of sea ice extent (SIE). She concludes, “The average reconstructed 25-year trends of SIE indicate that the rate of sea-ice loss during the ETCW was about ∼33–38% smaller than the 25-year trends observed during the satellite era.” Arctic SIE actually started to decrease in the late 1960s, this is the longest decline in SIE occurring at greater rates than has been observed in the in the last 170 years. This is also consistent with Kinnard’s study showing that recent declines in SIE is unprecedented over the last 1450 years.

References:

[1] Kinnard, C., Zdanowicz, C., Fisher, D. et al. Reconstructed changes in Arctic sea ice over the past 1,450 years. Nature 479, 509–512 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10581
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51825483_Reconstructed_changes_in_Arctic_sea_ice_over_the_past_1450_years

[2] Walsh, J.E., Fetterer, F., Scott Stewart, J. and Chapman, W.L. (2017), A database for depicting Arctic sea ice variations back to 1850. Geogr Rev, 107: 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2016.12195.x

[3] Brennan, M. K., Hakim, G. J., & Blanchard‐Wrigglesworth, E. (2020). Arctic sea‐ice variability during the instrumental era. Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL086843. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086843
https://atmos.uw.edu/~mkb22/files/Brennan_etal_2020.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Marketing of Alt-Data at Temperature.Global

Image
Temperature.Global (12-month running average, sort of) A few years ago, I started seeing people post links to a new dataset for global temperatures at a website called temperature.global. There are at least four unique features of this dataset. First, the website claims to update global temperature in near real time. Second, every year in the dataset averages below "normal." Third, there is absolutely no transparency regarding their methodology (those who administer it are anonymous, most of the data is hidden, and much of their methodology is unclear). And fourth, what is disclosed about their methodology reveals that what they are calculating is not the Earth's surface temperature. Description of Temperature.Global If you go to the temperature.global website, it becomes almost immediately apparent that this website has little concern for transparency. The website is hosted by Parler (the alternative social network), which if nothing else is pretty odd. There are no name
Read more

Are Scientists and Journalists Conspiring to Retract Papers?

Image
Dr. Roger Pielke, Jr has published two posts recently having to do with extreme weather and the IPCC. In the first post , he expresses frustration over an apparently inevitable retraction of a paper on extreme weather. The paper is Alimonti et al 2022 (A22) published in The European Physical Journal Plus (EPJP)[1]. I became aware of this paper about a year ago; it was not a good paper and was not particularly influential; it received almost no attention except for a brief period of time when the usual blogs promoted it, and then after SkyNews in Australia publicized this study as demonstrating there is no climate emergency. In the second post , Pielke summarized what he believes the IPCC's position is on extreme weather, and here he refers again to this previous paper. He declares that he believes that popular and scientific treatments of extreme weather have become far mor extreme than the position taken by the IPCC. According to him, "with the exception perhaps of only extr
Read more

Tropical Cyclone Trends

Image
In a previous post , I covered the distinction between detection and attribution. These are normally considered sequentially. First you detect a signal above natural variability, then you examine if some portion of that signal can be attributed to human activity. The previous post shows that the two are statistically independent from each other, so there is no need to limit attribution studies to signals that are detectable above natural variability. This distinction and clarification I think is important in discussions of tropical cyclone trends. While trends are clear since 1980, the longer term record (since ~1850-1900) is less clear due to selection biases arising from our increasing ability to detect tropical cyclones. This makes detection difficult long term, but that doesn't necessarily mean that scientists can't also examine ways in which human activity is affecting tropical cyclone trends. Detection in the Satellite Record (Since 1980) The satellite record provides us
Read more